Financial reporting and accounting advisory services
You trust your external auditor to deliver not only a high-quality, independent audit of your financial statements but to provide a range of support, including assessing material risks, evaluating internal controls and raising awareness around new and amended accounting standards.
Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises
Get the clear financial picture you need with the accounting standards team at Grant Thornton LLP. Our experts have extensive experience with private enterprises of all sizes in all industries, an in-depth knowledge of today’s accounting standards, and are directly involved in the standard-setting process.
International Financial Reporting Standards
Whether you are already using IFRS or considering a transition to this global framework, Grant Thornton LLP’s accounting standards team is here to help.
Accounting Standards for Not-for-Profit Organizations
From small, community organizations to large, national charities, you can count on Grant Thornton LLP’s accounting standards team for in-depth knowledge and trusted advice.
Public Sector Accounting Standards
Working for a public-sector organization comes with a unique set of requirements for accounting and financial reporting. Grant Thornton LLP’s accounting standards team has the practical, public-sector experience and in-depth knowledge you need.
Tax planning and compliance
Whether you are a private or public organization, your goal is to manage the critical aspects of tax compliance, and achieve the most effective results. At Grant Thornton, we focus on delivering relevant advice, and providing an integrated planning approach to help you fulfill compliance obligations.
Research & development, government incentives
Are you developing innovative processes or products, undertaking experimentation or solving technological problems? If so, you may qualify to claim SR&ED tax credits. This Canadian federal government initiative is designed to encourage and support innovation in Canada. Our R&D professionals are a highly-trained, diverse team of practitioners that are engineers, scientists and specialized accountants.
Keeping track of changes and developments in GST/HST, Quebec sales tax and other provincial sales taxes across Canada, can be a full-time job. The consequences for failing to adequately manage your organization’s sales tax obligations can be significant - from assessments, to forgone recoveries and cash flow implications, to customer or reputational risk.
US corporate tax
The United States has a very complex and regulated tax environment, that may undergo significant changes. Cross-border tax issues could become even more challenging for Canadian businesses looking for growth and prosperity in the biggest economy in the world.
Cross-border personal tax
In an increasingly flexible world, moving across the border may be more viable for Canadians and Americans; however, relocating may also have complex tax implications.
While there is great opportunity for businesses looking to expand globally, organizations are under increasing tax scrutiny. Regardless of your company’s size and level of international involvement—whether you’re working abroad, investing, buying and selling, borrowing or manufacturing—doing business beyond Canada’s borders comes with its fair share of tax risks.
Transfer pricing is a complex area of corporate taxation that is concerned with the intra-group pricing of goods, services, intangibles, and financial instruments. Transfer pricing has become a critical governance issue for companies, tax authorities and policy makers, and represents a principal risk area for multinationals.
Succession & estate planning
Like many private business owners today, you’ve spent your career building and running your business successfully. Now you’re faced with deciding on a successor—a successor who may or may not want your direct involvement and share your vision.
Tax Reporting & Advisory
The financial and tax reporting obligations of public markets and global tax authorities take significant resources and investment to manage. This requires calculating global tax provision estimates under US GAAP, IFRS, and other frameworks, and reconciling this reporting with tax compliance obligations.
Our transactions group takes a client-centric, integrated approach, focused on helping you make and implement the best financial strategies. We offer meaningful, actionable and holistic advice to allow you to create value, manage risks and seize opportunities. It’s what we do best: help great organizations like yours grow and thrive.
We bring a wide range of services to both individuals and businesses – including shareholders, executives, directors, lenders, creditors and other advisors who are dealing with a corporation experiencing financial challenges.
Market-driven expertise in investigation, dispute resolution and digital forensics
Viruses. Phishing. Malware infections. Malpractice by employees. Espionage. Data ransom and theft. Fraud. Cybercrime is now a leading risk to all businesses.
Running a business is challenging and you need advice you can rely on at anytime you need it. Our team dives deep into your issues, looking holistically at your organization to understand your people, processes, and systems needs at the root of your pain points. The intersection of these three things is critical to develop the solutions you need today.
Updates for creditors, limited partners, investors and shareholders.
ASPE Sec. 3041 Agriculture Understanding and applying the new ASPE Section 3041 AgricultureThe Canadian Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) has released new guidance on recognizing, measuring and disclosing biological assets and the harvested products of bio assets.
Tax alert Agricultural Clean Technology ProgramThe Agricultural Clean Technology Program will provide financial assistance to farmers and agri-businesses to help them reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Tax alert ACT Program – Research and Innovation Stream explainedThe ACT Research and Innovation Stream provides financial support to organizations engaged in pre-market innovation.
Tax alert ACT Program – Adoption Stream explainedThe ACT Adoption Stream provides non-repayable funding to help farmers and agri-business with the purchase and installation of clean technologies.
Builders And Developers
Every real estate project starts with a vision. We help builders and developers solidify that vision, transform it into reality, and create value.
Rental Property Owners And Occupiers
In today’s economic climate, it’s more important than ever to have a strong advisory partner on your side.
Real Estate Service Providers
Your company plays a key role in the success of landlords, investors and owners, but who is doing the same for you?
There’s no business quite like mining. It’s volatile, risky and complex – but the potential pay-off is huge. You’re not afraid of a challenge: the key is finding the right balance between risk and reward. Whether you’re a junior prospector, a senior producer, or somewhere in between, we’ll work with you to explore, discover and extract value at every stage of the mining process.
Oil & gas
The oil and gas industry is facing many complex challenges, beyond the price of oil. These include environmental issues, access to markets, growing competition from alternative energy sources and international markets, and a rapidly changing regulatory landscape, to name but a few.
Identifying a business combination within the scope of IFRS 3
Mergers and acquisitions are becoming more and more common as entities aim to achieve their growth objectives. IFRS 3 ‘Business Combinations’ contains the requirements for these transactions, which are challenging in practice.
Our ‘Insights into IFRS 3’ series summarizes the key areas of the Standard, highlighting aspects that are more difficult to interpret and revisiting the most relevant features that could impact your business.
In order to determine if the guidance of IFRS 3 should be applied to the acquisition of an asset or a group of assets, an entity should first identify if the asset or group of assets acquired represents a business combination. If the entity concludes it is a business combination, it should then ensure the business combination transaction falls within the scope of IFRS 3. This article sets out how an entity should determine if the transaction is a business combination, and whether it is within the scope of IFRS 3. This article should be read closely with our other ‘identification’ articles:
- Insights into IFRS 3 – Identifying an acquirer
- Insights into IFRS 3 – Identifying the acquisition date
Identifying a business combination
IFRS 3 refers to a ‘business combination’ rather than more commonly used phrases such as takeover, acquisition or merger because the objective is to encompass all the transactions in which an acquirer obtains control over an acquiree no matter how the transaction is structured. A business combination is defined as a transaction or other event in which an acquirer (an investor entity) obtains control of one or more businesses. An entity’s purchase of a controlling interest in another unrelated operating entity will usually be a business combination (see Example 1 on page 3). However, a business combination may be structured, and an entity may obtain control of that structure, in a variety of ways.
Therefore, identifying a business combination transaction requires the determination of whether:
- what is acquired constitutes a ‘business’ as defined in IFRS 3, and
- control has been obtained.
If an entity acquires an interest in a business entity but does not obtain control, it should apply IAS 28 ‘Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures’, IFRS 11 ‘Joint Arrangements’ or IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’, depending on the nature of the relationship that the interest creates and the level of influence the entity can exert over the investee’s financial and operating policies.
Example 1 – Straightforward business combination
Entity T is a clothing manufacturer and has traded for a number of years. Entity T is deemed to be a business. On 1 January 2020, Entity A pays CU 2,000 to acquire 100% of the ordinary voting shares of Entity T. No other type of shares has been issued by Entity T. On the same day, the three main executive directors of Entity A take on the same roles in Entity T.
Entity A obtains control on 1 January 2020 by acquiring 100% of the voting rights. As Entity T is a business, this is a business combination in accordance with IFRS 3.
Is the investee a “business”?
IFRS 3 requires the entity determine whether assets acquired, and any liabilities assumed constitute a business. If the assets and liabilities are not considered to be a business, then the transaction should be accounted for as an asset acquisition. IFRS 3 has detailed guidance on the definition of a business and this guidance has been considered in our separate article ‘Insights into IFRS 3 – Definition of a business (Amendments to IFRS 3)’. This publication presents only the guidance on the new definition of a business that was issued in October 2018, which should be applied to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after 1 January 2020 and to asset acquisitions that occur on or after the beginning of that period.
Business combination accounting does not apply to the acquisition of an asset or asset group that does not constitute a business. The distinction between a business combination and an asset acquisition is important as the accounting for an asset purchase differs from business combination accounting in several key respects, some of which are summarized below:
Notes to table
- In November 2017, the IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) discussed some issues related to how to allocate the transaction price to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed when the sum of the individual fair values of the identifiable assets and liabilities is different from the transaction price and when the group includes identifiable assets and liabilities initially measured both at cost and at an amount other than cost.
- Except for costs related to the issuance of equity instruments or debt instruments that have to be accounted for in accordance with IFRS 9 and IAS 32 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’.
Has control been obtained?
A business combination involves an entity obtaining control over one or more businesses (this entity is known as ‘the acquirer’). IFRS 10 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’ and IFRS 3 provide guidance to determine whether an entity has obtained control. In most cases control of an investee is obtained through holding the majority of voting rights. Therefore, control is normally obtained through ownership of a majority of the shares that confer voting rights (or through obtaining additional voting rights resulting in majority ownership if some were already held). In transactions where an acquired business is not a separate legal entity (a trade and assets deal), control typically arises through ownership of those assets.
However, control can also be obtained through various other transactions and arrangements – some of which require careful analysis and judgement. The definition of control and relevant guidance issued by both the IASB and IFRIC should then be considered. As well as assessing whether control is obtained, this guidance is also relevant in addressing the related questions of when control transfers and which entity obtains control.
- power over the investee
- exposure, or rights, to variable returns
- ability to use power to affect returns.
For more explanation on how to apply the definition of control, refer to our IFRS 10 guide entitled ‘Under control? A practical guide to applying IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements’. If applying the guidance of IFRS 10 does not clearly indicate which of the combining entities is the acquirer, additional factors included within IFRS 3 should be considered. For instance, it is possible for control to be obtained:
- without holding or acquiring a majority of the investee’s voting rights
- without the investor actually being party to a transaction or paying consideration.
The identification of an acquirer is discussed in more detail in a separate article. Refer to ‘Insights into IFRS 3 – Identifying the acquirer’.
Definition of control of an investee
An investor controls an investee when the investor is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee.
“The determination of whether an entity has obtained control is based on guidance in both IFRS 10 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’ and IFRS 3.”
Is the business combination within the scope of IFRS 3?
IFRS 3 applies to all business combinations identified as such under IFRS 3 with the following three exceptions:
- the formation of a joint arrangement in the financial statements of the joint arrangement itself
- a combination of entities or businesses under common control (referred to as common control combinations)
- the acquisition by an investment entity, as defined in IFRS 10, of an investment in a subsidiary that is required to be measured at fair value through profit or loss (without exception).
Formation of a joint arrangement in the financial statements of the joint arrangement itself
There is no specific guidance in IFRS on how a joint arrangement should account for a business contribution which consists in the parties to the joint arrangement in contributing operating activities which satisfy the definition of businesses in exchange for equity instruments issued by the ‘joint arrangement structure’. Our view is that IFRS 3, by analogy, can be applied by the joint arrangement, even though the transaction is outside the mandatory scope of IFRS 3.
Alternative approaches may also be acceptable, such as the use of predecessor value method or application of fresh start accounting. Management should use their judgement and apply the requirements of IAS 8 ‘Accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and errors’ to determine the most appropriate accounting policy to provide relevant and reliable information to users of the financial statements.
Common control combinations
Business combinations involving common control frequently occur. Broadly, these are transactions in which an entity obtains control of a business (hence a business combination) but both combining parties are ultimately controlled by the same party, or parties, both before and after the combination and that control is not transitory. These combinations often occur as a result of a group reorganization in which control of subsidiaries changes at a certain level within a group as a result of reclassification of ownership interests between the members of the group, but where control by the ultimate parent remains the same over those subsidiaries.
Our separate article ‘Insights into IFRS 3 – Business combinations under common control’ provides more details on how to identify and account for these combinations.
“Of the three scoped-out transactions in IFRS 3, business combinations involving common control frequently occur.”
The acquisition by an investment entity of an investment in a subsidiary that is required to be measured at fair value through profit or loss
For the avoidance of doubt, IFRS 10 provides a limited scope exception from the consolidation guidance for a parent entity that meets the definition of an investment entity. Entities that meet the definition of an investment entity in accordance with IFRS 10, should not consolidate certain subsidiaries. Instead they are required to measure those investments that are controlling interests in another entity (ie their subsidiaries) at fair value through profit and loss. Therefore, any acquisition that involves an investment entity being the acquirer of an investment in a subsidiary is specifically excluded from the scope of IFRS 3. Refer to IFRS 10 guide ‘Under control? A practical guide to applying IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements’ for more details.
Watch this space
At the time of writing the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is conducting a research project on business combinations under common control. The IASB has acknowledged that the absence of specific requirements has led to diversity in practice and has published a discussion paper in November 2020. The IASB is seeking views on the paper before 1 September 2021 and we will be submitting our views.